Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
349
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 00:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
NOT POSSIBLE!!!
Ganking CAN'T be done in Eve anymore.
Mackinaws are INVULNERABLE.
      I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
352
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 00:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Not invulnerable, just not cheap to do. No way man. I've been reading for days and days about "Eve is dying" because of the Mack buff. yaddy ya....
And if...errr... "not profitable".... what would be the errr..... reason..... for.... the.... errr... interdiction?
Lies. All lies. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
352
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 00:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: No way man. I've been reading for days and days about "Eve is dying" because of the Mack buff. yaddy ya....
And if...errr... "not profitable".... what would be the errr..... reason..... for.... the.... errr... interdiction?
Lies. All lies.
You can thank the freighter pilots for the subsities  Also NC. So ganking Macks IS possible AND it's able to be done PROFITABLY.
I feel much better now. I was positive the horrendous angst in multiple topics, the tears, the concerns, the outrage, the rants about those stupid, stupid miners and those poor, poor gankers was all TRUE.
Phew.
Ok, thx. Resuming life as I know it. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
354
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 01:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:So ganking Macks IS possible AND it's able to be done PROFITABLY. Attacking a Mack isn't profitable. What's profitable is buying up all the supplies at the all-time low, and then attacking to force the price upwards ... then sell those stocks. So you're saying that picking up horse dung is not actually profitable - but selling it for fertilizer is? I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
354
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 01:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote:Not invulnerable, just not cheap to do. No way man. I've been reading for days and days about "Eve is dying" because of the Mack buff. yaddy ya.... And if...errr... "not profitable".... what would be the errr..... reason..... for.... the.... errr... interdiction? Lies. All lies. This. After all the whinage and crying that suiciding miners is no longer profitable I find it hard to believe that miners are being suicided to increase... profits. Keep in mind we weren't whining about it. I was gonna make the call on this one....
But I'll be danged if I am going to spend the next 5 hours linking the hundreds of Goons and FA "poor ganker", "Eve is DYING" poasts on the topic. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
354
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 01:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: So ganking Macks IS possible AND it's able to be done PROFITABLY.
No. So you are taking over NC. space because............ I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
354
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 01:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: So ganking Macks IS possible AND it's able to be done PROFITABLY.
No. So you are taking over NC. space because............ They attacked us. I lolled. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 02:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: I was gonna make the call on this one....
But I'll be danged if I am going to spend the next 5 hours linking the hundreds of Goons and FA "poor ganker", "Eve is DYING" poasts on the topic.
The only difference is now we have to use 2 catalysts. That's not really a big deal. I don't see why anyone would whine about that. The act of solo ganking itself isn't "profitable" anymore if that was what you are talking about. Whining that they can't play solo in an MMORG. Hmmm... Sounds familiar.
They could always errr.... multibox. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 04:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:Touval, you are the most cognitively impaired poster in recent memory. Please stop posting. Think of the children. Think of the world they will have to grow up in, filled with your words. Stop posting for their sake. Cognitively impaired only by the degree of how much you disagree with me.
And I have other alts who have and can continue to post with just as much cognitive impairment if you would prefer.
/me swears that 90% of the "oh look, you're dumb" retorts in this forum are by persons sharing a C&P file. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 04:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Powers Sa wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:Powers Sa wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: I was gonna make the call on this one....
But I'll be danged if I am going to spend the next 5 hours linking the hundreds of Goons and FA "poor ganker", "Eve is DYING" poasts on the topic.
The only difference is now we have to use 2 catalysts. That's not really a big deal. I don't see why anyone would whine about that. The act of solo ganking itself isn't "profitable" anymore if that was what you are talking about. Whining that they can't play solo in an MMORG. Hmmm... Sounds familiar. They could always errr.... multibox. who's your main? A goon.
Come get me. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
356
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 05:20:00 -
[11] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: I lolled.
Well at least you've proven you have no clue what's going on in nullsec with this post (Hint: the whole thing started with NCdot sieging our tech moons. This is punative.) I lolled at the way baltec made it look serious - I was imagining the deadpan look and because I never take any Goon seriously, when they are, it's like, funny.
Bah. nvm. You guys need to relax a little. You're letting shitz and gigglez get under your skin.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
365
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 19:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:I'm sure somebody is just chomping at the bit to use locator agents to track you down and pop your cherry. Just because you posted that. For 20m, I'll tell you were he mines. Miners should not be THIS stupid. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
365
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 20:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: Just pointing out. They still dont tank their ships.
What I heard, they don't need to. CCP did it for them.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
367
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 20:47:00 -
[14] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Three more Catalyst dead. Loot scooped and resuming mining. Think I might go make a sandwich, yeah that sounds good. /me takes note of collusion between Goons and NC.
Is this a SAVE Highsec CTA?
Is Nulli coming? I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:baltec1 wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: This.
After all the whinage and crying that suiciding miners is no longer profitable I find it hard to believe that miners are being suicided to increase... profits.
Whoever said anythng about making a profit? A profit might be possible. Consider this: gank every miner except your own, be the only one mining the resource. Profit? So it might have been lucrative to just gank the miners and have a stockpile of the targeted resource already at hand, and then sell it at a higher price. The cost of ganking now might offset that, but the hull buff may have now required that the gankers harvest the resources themselves. This is my theory or assumption. They might just be trying to see if it's possible. Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:40:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you.
Not sure if you're trolling or not, just because you mine your own minerals doesn't make them free, they're worth as much as someone is willing to pay for them. I'll argue this till the cows come home. There is no REAL cost to aquisition in a VR environment except time. Only a-retents pouring over little squares in a maths app think there is.
If you intend to calculate time in the aquisition then there are far more profitable ways to make isk and I've hammered this home a million times.
Gankers need to gank for fun and stop using any economic argument to justify it. Period.
PS: Besides, you're talking about mineral value at sale. Nothing actually has value until it is for sale. File that one in your economics folder under R for reality.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist seven times, but I thought this was just a game.
Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.
I love this! Seriously, they called you a *&^%$# coward because you flew away in your MINING VESSEL as they came to hit you with 9, read NINE battlecruisers?
YOU'RE a coward?
ROFLMAO... I'm laughing so hard I'm crying.... I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them. Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I.
And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR.
Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all.
>>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them"
Exactly what I'm saying.
Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them. Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I. And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR. Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all. >>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them" Exactly what I'm saying. Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever. Ganking shouldn't be done for the profit? Oh, I think the last freighter the goons popped would beg to differ... Didn't say it CAN'T be, I said it SHOULDN'T be.
Besides the argument was whether time mining to MAKE a gankmobile can be considered as a "cost" to improve the profitability of the gank.
If profit was the pure motivation then there are much better ways to make the time used in Eve more profitable.
Why bother ganking for profit? I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
372
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I.
And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR.
Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all.
>>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them"
Exactly what I'm saying.
Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever.
A job you say? $45 an hour you say? There's these things called economies, with few exceptions they're not in a good state globally. Where I live there are 1500 people going for every job that comes up, and believe me none of them are paying $45 an hour. In real money terms (to me) $45 an hour is -ú28 an hour, I know very few people who earn even close to that. I'm a specialist auto electrician by trade, I specialised in fitting optional entertainment systems into high end vehicles such as Bentley & Rolls Royce, as well as aftermarket electronics into cars that the average consumer can't fit their own stuff into because of technologies such as CANBUS and MOST, that trade is dead, nobody has the money anymore to purchase the stuff let alone pay for it to be fitted, long gone are the days when people would spend -ú10k on vehicle enhancements. I'm looking for a permanent job, I have paid good money to train new skills, the jobs that are out there have more applicants than they know what to do with. I'm currently doing casual work on building sites to keep a roof over my head and food in my belly, and that work is drying up. Now talk to me about real life economics. That's a sad situation, particualrly for a tradee. I'm on $80+/hr (AU) and I'm sem-retired so I s'pose I just picked the right profession.
But regardless, unless you're RMT, nothing in Eve will change what happens in RL in a meaningful way so it's a moot point.
The converse is true though - what you do in RL CAN effect what you do in Eve. Where we intend to cojoin RL and VR economic theories we need to be cognizant of that fact and adjust our arguments accordingly to include BOTH as a possible source of income.
The fact is, once done like that, NOTHING in Eve comes close to ISK conversion as does RL >> VR.
TLDR: People are happy to include RL theory behind many arguments (including me) but are happy to discard it just as readily when it suits too. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
374
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote: Just pointing out. They still dont tank their ships.
What I heard, they don't need to. CCP did it for them. You heard or read Baltec Zim and Darth too? But seems they can still gank ships. It's good news for them, bad for idiots. We are teaching bad miners the difference between not profitable to gank and ungankable. You could, you know, just send 'em an email. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
374
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:05:00 -
[22] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
If you want to fit for max yield, then you risk getting suicide ganked... The choice is yours... and CCP should not hold your hand and protect you anymore than they already have!!!
Thanks. The gankers always say we are 'stupid' for not tanking 100%. For me, it's RISK vs REWARD. Not stupidity. And I will almost always fit for max yield. ...and not been blown up while mining in over 1yr, 8 months. Those miners who do get exploded are AFK, period. Now where did I see you last?
Oh, around Orva and Thiarer, that's right, the Derelik region. Can't recall you mining in the lowsec territories around there though.
Might go take a look with my cynnie or.... tornado.
Wave won't you. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
375
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 06:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote: I am a bit out of the loop on how you guys went from claiming on the forums that the new mining barges were the result of too many miners crying because you were suicide ganking them, and thus claiming the mining barge tank buff was over the top. Yet here you are. Ganking again, when you claimed it was impossible/completely not worth it. But please carry on, this has been amusing. I would have to say the best part was when I went afk to see a sneak peak of the new James Bond movie, Skyfall and came back to see my ship was still alive (missing one drone, strange) and had 4 Catalyst kill mails.
inb4 someone says - "duh, we can gank, we just can't do it PROFITABLY".
on the km's... AFK PvP - how dare you??!!
It's gotta be against the EULA or sumthin'.....
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
376
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 06:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
captain foivos wrote: Surprise surprise, Marlona Sky is making **** up. Even if you did use an alt, you could have done nothing more than tag along on the killmail for a small percentage of damage as Concord Police Commander did all the work.
Plus, I haven't seen any of this "ganker rage." I have seen a bunch of dead miners, though.
She did use an alt and said so.
And really, she got in on the KM, even a "Concord" mail is a little tick against the ganker and a little tick for the gankee. It's wonderful stuff.
And no ganker rage??!! My dear fellow, where HAVE you been? "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
378
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 09:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tippia wrote:......and the notion that just because you own stuff, it has no value (which is essentially what you're saying) is, shall we say, flawed. I do not agree. Value is an intangible. What is given - in exchange - is tangible.
Only when a conversion occurs is the value - percieved or actual - realised.
But meh. I'm not going to go around and round on a philosophical discussion on when something actually attains value. You say it has an intrinsic value at creation, I say it does not until conversion to a tangible is achieved.
Either way, I'm not going to try to "win" a Tippia paragraphing contest. I'll die of sheer boredom. Your tenacity in pursuit of the singular is legendary. Bad for debate but legendary. So yep. You win. Whatever.
"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
391
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 02:27:00 -
[26] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:captain foivos wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:And really, she got in on the KM, even a "Concord" mail is a little tick against the ganker and a little tick for the gankee. It's wonderful stuff. Killboard's green, go go go, amirite? I couldn't find a single tornado death, in highsec, from Concord, in the CFC, anywhere on the killboards. Anywhere. Perhaps you could point me in the right direction by finding these tornadoes Marlona speaks of? Watch as Touval Lysander suddenly goes silent on this particular topic. You STILL posting on your 0.0 alt and not on your highsec FW, indy, mining alt.
In that case, I'll show the respect you desire deserve.
bite me. "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
391
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 02:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:
Why bother ganking for profit?
Did not bother to read rest of post, answer is because profit can be made while ganking. The question was more why bother ganking for profit when you know profit is not there to be made.
Why - because It's easier to whine about it than actually do a gank that DOES have profit or just cough up and say it's fun.
Nope, it's gotta be a miner apparently (they want it solo and easymode). The only thing they haven't asked for yet is which miner, what belt and what time they would like him to be there.
But give it time. That's probably another thread when they finally work out they're just blowing hot air. "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
417
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 23:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: It is possible to gank mackinaws for profit with these values.... although the profit margin is slim....
It is possible that the mackinaws being ganked aren't being ganked entirely for profit.
It's got something to do with that place out there, you know, null, whatever the **** that is. Or so I got told anyway.
Thought for the day, can null actually exist? "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
421
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 02:29:00 -
[29] - Quote
Quote:(Hey CCP, release some faction/deadspace mining lasers, harvesters and upgrades. Give the yield miners an opportunity to bling out their ships. Bring back miner ganking for profit to some small degree.) lolz. just lolz.
Faction is usually == T2 so errr... why would they?
I used to fly with a faction booster for cap stability for naughty rats in lowsec? Would that help?
Maybe the Harvester drones I use to have?
The T2 rigs I used to fit?
No?
Maybe we just need gankers to realise that miners don't actually care and then we can move on a bit from this garbage. "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
422
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 06:28:00 -
[30] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: Maybe we just need gankers to realise that miners don't actually care and then we can move on a bit from this garbage.
And you had the nerve to call me illiterate?
My English was true, My heart was so pure, Of the things that I said, I am definitely sure.
Poetic is here, Once again so I see, Trying to do a Tippia, On lil' ol'me.
But you're 2 paragraphs short, And a touch out of line, Tippia you're not, It's just a Poetic whine.
Is it Stanziel for Stanza, Or Stanziel for Zeal, The words that you speak, Sorry, none of it's real.
(c) TL 2012 "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
434
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 19:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Miners and Industrialists:STOP posting in these threads.
Excuse me. I used to be a miner, and an industrialist and I tried ganking a few times and failed (when it was easy).
Can I post?
"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
|
|
|